Evidence & verification reports

Use evidence & verification reports when you need a bounded answer rather than a generic promise about AI coding. The 3 articles separate observed evidence, working assumptions, product boundaries, and decisions that still belong to a human reviewer. Each guide is dated and keeps its source limitations visible.

Start with “Evidence Reports” for the broadest entry point, then use “Rebuilding Trust in AI Pull Requests” when you need the collection's more specific edge. The cards below state what each article covers, so you can choose by task instead of reading a manufactured sequence. Related links inside each guide connect methods, risks, evidence, and next actions without treating one check as universal proof.

Check each article's publication date, cited source, and stated scope before applying it to a live repository. Examples explain a method; they do not replace your project rules, threat model, tests, or accountable reviewer. If two guides appear to conflict, compare their assumptions and evidence rather than selecting the more confident wording.